Introduction
When implementing Single Sign-On (SSO), one of the first decisions you'll face is choosing between SAML and OAuth/OpenID Connect. Both protocols can achieve similar outcomes, but they have different strengths and are suited to different use cases. This article breaks down everything you need to know to make the right choice.
A Brief History
SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language)
SAML was developed in 2001 by OASIS, with SAML 2.0 released in 2005. It was designed specifically for enterprise web-based SSO and has been the industry standard for nearly two decades.
OAuth 2.0 & OpenID Connect
OAuth 1.0 emerged in 2007 as a way to authorize third-party access to resources (think "Login with Facebook"). OAuth 2.0 came in 2012, and OpenID Connect (OIDC) was built on top of OAuth 2.0 in 2014 to add identity layer capabilities.
How They Work
SAML Flow
OAuth 2.0 + OIDC Flow
Key Differences
Data Format
| Aspect | SAML | OAuth/OIDC |
|--------|------|------------|
| Format | XML | JSON |
| Token Type | Assertion | JWT |
| Size | Larger (verbose XML) | Smaller (compact JSON) |
Use Cases
| Scenario | Better Choice |
|----------|---------------|
| Enterprise web SSO | SAML |
| Mobile applications | OAuth/OIDC |
| API authentication | OAuth/OIDC |
| Legacy enterprise systems | SAML |
| Modern SaaS applications | Either (OIDC preferred) |
| B2B customer portals | SAML |
Complexity
- SAML: More complex initial setup, but well-documented enterprise patterns
- OAuth/OIDC: Simpler to implement, but more flexibility can mean more decisions
When to Choose SAML
Choose SAML when:
- Many enterprise IdPs like Okta, Azure AD, and OneLogin have better SAML support
- B2B customers often expect SAML as it's the enterprise standard
- SAML has more standardized attribute definitions
- Some industries mandate SAML for certain use cases
- Older enterprise applications typically only support SAML
When to Choose OAuth/OIDC
Choose OAuth/OIDC when:
- OAuth was designed with these use cases in mind
- OAuth's token-based approach is ideal for APIs
- JSON is easier to work with than XML
- Social logins (Google, Facebook) use OAuth
- OAuth's scope mechanism provides flexible permissions
Can You Support Both?
Absolutely! Many modern applications support both SAML and OIDC. This is often the best approach because:
- Enterprise customers can use their preferred SAML-based IdPs
- Smaller customers can use Google or other OIDC providers
- Future flexibility as the industry evolves
SecurePie supports both protocols, allowing you to offer customers their preferred authentication method without any additional development work.
Implementation Considerations
Security Considerations
SAML Security:
- Validate XML signatures carefully
- Watch for XML injection attacks
- Ensure proper certificate management
OAuth/OIDC Security:
- Use PKCE for public clients
- Validate tokens properly
- Store tokens securely
Testing Your Implementation
Regardless of protocol choice:
The Verdict
There's no universally "better" protocol—the right choice depends on your specific needs:
- Enterprise B2B focus? → Start with SAML
- Consumer apps or APIs? → Start with OAuth/OIDC
- Want maximum flexibility? → Support both
At SecurePie, we've made this decision easy by supporting both protocols out of the box. Whether your customers use Okta with SAML or Google with OIDC, they get the same seamless SSO experience.
Next Steps
Ready to implement SSO for your Shopify store? Check out our integration guides: